-
employee looking frustrated outside an office building
Subject is a model
-
-
-
-
-
serious employee outside an office building
Subject is a model
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Companies plan replacement hiring before termination all the time, that’s just operational continuity. What’s harder to defend is the timeline: the CEO delayed the actual conversation purely because he was traveling, leaving weeks of active recruitment happening in plain sight of the person it directly affects.
-
-
That gap put someone else in an impossible spot. Sitting across from a coworker daily, fielding questions about why hiring is ramping up, and giving technically true but deliberately incomplete answers isn’t comfortable for anyone with a conscience. Delivering termination news genuinely isn’t a coworker’s job to hand off, so staying quiet wasn’t wrong exactly. But there’s a difference between staying out of someone else’s responsibility and getting pulled into the information gap that makes their blindside possible.
-
-
A soon-to-be-terminated employee deserves that news from the person actually making the decision, not stretched out for weeks while intern postings and full-time job listings quietly go up around her. Delaying a hard conversation for travel convenience doesn’t soften the outcome. It just turns the eventual reveal into something that feels a lot more like a setup than a decision.
Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.